标题    全文    标题或全文  |   精确查询    模糊查询
标题:
全文:
期刊名称:
全部
作者:
作者单位:
关键词:
期刊年份:
全部
期号:
学科分类:
全部
搜索 清空
中国移植罪刑法定原则的可能性--何以与中国本土资源相衔接
《天津法学》
2014年
4
5-11
孙倩;赵晓耕
中国人民大学;法学院
最原始意义上的罪刑法定原则,产生于欧洲大陆国家,是与欧洲中世纪的司法擅断密切相关的。当我们进一步探究中世纪的司法擅断时,我们会发现这是西欧大陆封建制的必然产物,毫无制约的权力与武力镇压是其特色,所以罪刑法定原则是制约封建制下的各个封建领主绝对司法权的产物,其本质在于监督。而中国古代的帝制确保了对下级官吏包括审理案件的官员的监督,在这种政治体制下,面临的问题是对皇权的监督,而比附援引正是对皇权进行监督的措施。
中世纪司法擅断        封建制        帝制        比附援引        春秋决狱
In the most original meaning the principle of legality is generated in the countries of continental Europe, and it is closely related to the judicial tyranny in the Middle Ages. When we further explore the me-dieval judicial tyranny, we will find that this is the inevitable product of Western Europe feudal system, and power without restriction and military crackdown are its characteristic. So the principle of legality is the prod-uct of the feudal system of restriction under each feudal lord's absolute judicial power, and its essence lies in the supervision. And Chinese ancient imperialism ensures the supervision of subordinate officials including officials in the trial of the case. In this political system, the problem is how to supervise the imperial power, and the analogies, comparisons and quote are measures to supervise the imperial power.
medieval judicial tyranny;the feudal system;the imperial system;the analogies,comparisons and quote;chun qiu statute
保存检索条件
X
添加标签:

给这组订阅条件设置标签名称,可以更加方便您管理和查看。

保存条件:
微信“扫一扫”
法信App“扫一扫”
操作提示
对不起,您尚未登录,不能进行此操作!
关联法条X